🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute small “sweetheart”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective friend. Zephyr has “endless energy” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a closed attraction, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned debate over their destiny often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been closely studied by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the federal government blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are held warned to end their lives unless the government covers the upkeep of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that demand, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and social skills suggest they are deeply intelligent mammals – something Kristy Burgess discovered personally.

Burgess spent several years as a beluga trainer, a position that required building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so surprised by the details and quirks in their characters. She developed a particular love for a pair of whales with contrasting natures.

“One whale accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each transformed the way I perceive bonding.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her interaction with the whales progressed against a context of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which advocates say indicates the substandard environment in which they were housed.

The facility did not open to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes results of the cessation. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a questionnaire, but previously stated: “The whales … obtain far higher quality health care and constant supervision than any human in the UK, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was terminated from the park in the spring following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the facility suspected particulars of the incident were leaked to the news outlets and she was fired soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and current and former trainers in despair. She says the facility’s warning to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “immense staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for requests for the whales to be removed right away from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister denied a proposal to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the request would have meant a continued existence in confinement and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister commented. “As society, we know that whales should be in the sea, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience authorize an transfer that would prolong the treatment these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s statements reveal a more general incorrect perception of the realities of existence for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As officials struggle to find a resolution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A planned protected area in the region of Nova Scotia, which now received official endorsement, has been contentious. The future site, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could in time represent a long term answer for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Different voices say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a changing attitudes away from animal displays and could represent a feasible solution in the short term.

Charles Vinick, head of the plan, said the site will simulate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales receive from trainers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|